Image processing apparatus, information processing method and storage medium

ABSTRACT

A printing apparatus is provided with a plurality of analyzing units, and a control unit. Each of the plurality of analyzing units analyzes each of different pages of print data, and notifies an error in a case that an analysis error occurs. The control unit receives the error notification from the analyzing unit, at which the analysis error occurs, among the plurality of analyzing units. And, the control unit notifies a cancel to another analyzing unit at which the analysis error does not occur. The control unit is further configured to notify, on a condition that a printing of all pages before a page at which the analysis error occurs is completed, the cancel to the another analyzing unit.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an image processing technology which can perform appropriate processing according to an error, even when a plurality of analyzing units has been applied to the analysis processing of print data.

2. Description of the Related Art

A printing apparatus receives print data referred to as PDL (Page Description Language), analyzes the received print data, generates a bitmapped image in which a character and/or a figure are drawn, and performs print processing. If there is unknown data or the like in the print data, an error occurs in analysis processing, and the print processing after the error is canceled.

Conventionally, the analysis processing of print data has been executed by a CPU of a single core (processor having one core). At this time, the print data is analyzed in order of page, and the processing is suspended when an error has occurred. Accordingly, papers of the pages for which processing has ended are ejected (print result is output).

In recent years, a CPU of a multi-core (processor having a plurality of cores) has appeared, and the multi-core CPU is adopted for the enhancement of throughput in various fields. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-183757 discloses that the multi-core is applied also to the analysis processing of print data.

In the case where the multi-core is applied to the analysis processing of the print data, if a plurality of pages is simultaneously analyzed by a plurality of cores, and the processing is suspended when the error has occurred, the page which would have been output in the conventional printing apparatus may not be output, and appropriate processing according to the error becomes necessary.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to an aspect of the present invention, a printing apparatus comprises: a plurality of analyzing units, each configured to analyze each of different pages of print data and to notify an error in a case that an analysis error occurs; a control unit configured to receive the error notification from the analyzing unit, at which the analysis error occurs, among the plurality of analyzing units, and to notify a cancel to another analyzing unit at which the analysis error does not occur, wherein, the control unit is further configured to notify, on a condition that a printing of all pages before a page at which the analysis error occurs is completed, the cancel to the another analyzing unit.

Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view illustrating one example of a hardware configuration of a printing apparatus.

FIG. 2 is a view illustrating one example of a software configuration for analyzing the print data of the printing apparatus.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of an analyzing unit.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a notification management unit.

FIG. 5 is a view illustrating the software configuration of a printing apparatus which performs analysis processing by a single core.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a control unit.

FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C are views illustrating one example of the processing which prints the print data of 2 pages.

FIG. 8 is a view illustrating one example of the processing which prints the print data of 2 pages in a conventional printing apparatus.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a notification management unit.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a control unit.

FIG. 11 is a view illustrating a software configuration for analyzing the print data of the printing apparatus.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a notification management unit.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of a control unit.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in accordance with the accompanying drawings.

Embodiment 1

FIG. 1 is a view illustrating one example of a hardware configuration of a printing apparatus. The printing apparatus is one example of the image processing apparatus.

In the printing apparatus, a multi-core CPU 102, a RAM 103, a ROM 104, an engine 105, an input unit 106, a display unit 107, an external memory 108 and a communication IF 109 are connected to each other through a system bus 101. Each of the units which are connected to the system bus 101 is configured so as to be capable of transmitting and receiving data between each other, through the system bus 101.

The ROM 104 is a non-volatile memory, and various programs and the like for operating the multi-core CPU 102 are stored in predetermined regions, respectively.

The RAM 103 is a volatile memory, and is used as a temporary storage region such as a main memory and a work area of the multi-core CPU 102.

The multi-core CPU 102 is a multi-core processor, and controls each of the units of the printing apparatus while using the RAM 103 as a work memory, for instance, according to a program stored in the ROM 104. The program is not necessarily stored in the ROM 104, but may be previously stored in the external memory 108 such as a hard disk.

The input unit 106 receives a user operation, generates a control signal according to the operation, and supplies the generated control signal to the multi-core CPU 102. The multi-core CPU 102 controls each of the units of the printing apparatus according to the program, based on the control signal which is supplied from the input unit 106.

The display unit 107 displays a GUI screen for the user, based on a display control signal which the multi-core CPU 102 generates.

An external memory such as the hard disk and a memory card can be mounted on the external memory 108. The data is read out from and written in the mounted external memory 108, based on the control of the multi-core CPU 102. The communication IF 109 performs communication with various networks such as a wired network and a wireless network, based on the control of the multi-core CPU 102.

The engine 105 outputs a bitmapped image which the multi-core CPU 102 has generated according to the program, to a print medium.

The multi-core CPU 102 executes processing based on the program which is memorized in the ROM 104 or the external memory 108, and thereby a software configuration of the printing apparatus and the processing of a flow chart are achieved which will be described later.

FIG. 2 is a view illustrating one example of a software configuration for analyzing the print data of the printing apparatus.

The control unit 201 controls the whole print processing in a period after having received the print data until printing the print data.

A notification management unit 202 is positioned between the control unit 201 and analyzing units 203 a and 203 b, and acts as a liaison between the units. The notification management unit 202 detects an error occurring in the analyzing unit 203 a or 203 b, and notifies the control unit 201 of the error. In addition, the notification management unit 202 notifies both of the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b of a cancel notification which the control unit 201 outputs after having received the error notification.

The analyzing units 203 a and 203 b analyze the print data. In the present embodiment, the multi-core CPU shall execute these software modules, the analyzing unit 203 a shall analyze odd pages of the print data, and the analyzing unit 203 b shall analyze even pages of the print data. When having received the cancel notification, the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b stop analysis processing.

Cancel processing in the case where the error has occurred during an analysis of the print data, in such a software configuration, will be described below with reference to flow charts in FIGS. 3, 4 and 5.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the information processing of the analyzing unit (203 a or 203 b).

In a step S301, the analyzing unit checks whether there is a notification of a print data analysis start from the notification management unit 202. The control unit 201 which receives the print data notifies the notification management unit 202 of the print data analysis start, and the notification management unit 202 which has received the notification notifies the analyzing unit of the print data analysis start. When there is the notification of the print data analysis start, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S302. When there is not the notification of the print data analysis start, the analyzing unit repeats the processing of the step S301.

In the step S302, the analyzing unit notifies the notification management unit 202 of the total page number of the print data.

In a step S303, the analyzing unit starts the analysis processing of the print data.

In a step S304, the analyzing unit checks whether the error has occurred during the analysis processing of the print data. When the error has occurred, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S305. When the error has not occurred, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S306.

In the step S305, the analyzing unit notifies the notification management unit 202 of the occurrence of the error.

In the step S306, the analyzing unit checks whether there is a cancel notification from the notification management unit 202. When there is the cancel notification, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S307. When there is not the notification of the cancel, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S308.

In the step S307, the analyzing unit stops the analysis processing.

In the step S308, the analyzing unit checks whether the analysis processing for one page has ended. When the analysis processing for one page has ended, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S309. When the analysis processing for one page has not ended, the analyzing unit returns to the processing of the step S303, and continues the analysis processing.

In the step S309, the analyzing unit notifies the notification management unit 202 of an end of the analysis processing for one page.

In a step S310, the analyzing unit checks whether the analysis processing for all of the print data has ended. When the analysis processing has ended, the analyzing unit progresses to the processing of a step S311. When the analysis processing has not ended, the analyzing unit returns to the processing of the step S303, and continues the analysis processing.

In the step S311, the analyzing unit notifies the notification management unit 202 of the end of the analysis of the print data.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the notification management unit 202.

In a step S401, the notification management unit 202 checks whether there is a notification sent from the control unit 201. When there is the notification of the cancel, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S402. When there is a notification of a printed page, which indicates a page that has been printed out, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S403. When there is a notification of a print data analysis start, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S404. Incidentally, the printed page may be such a page that the generation of a bitmapped image (drawing processing) for one page to be printed has been completed. In addition, when there is no notification sent from the control unit 201, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S405.

In the step S402, the notification management unit 202 notifies the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b of the cancel of the analysis processing.

In the step S403, the notification management unit 202 renews a value of the printed page, which the notification management unit 202 stores in itself.

In the step S404, the notification management unit 202 notifies the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b of the print data analysis start.

In the step S405, the notification management unit 202 checks whether there is a notification sent from the analyzing units 203 a and/or 203 b. When there is the notification of the error, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S410. When there is a notification of a page analysis end, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S406. When there is a notification of a print data analysis end, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S408. When there is a notification of the total page number, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S409. When there is no notification sent from the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b, the notification management unit 202 returns to the processing of the step S401.

In the step S406, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the page analysis end.

In the step S407, the notification management unit 202 renews a value of the analyzed page, which the notification management unit 202 stores in itself.

In the step S408, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the print data analysis end.

In the step S409, the notification management unit 202 stores a value of the total page number of the print data.

In the step S410, the notification management unit 202 checks whether the error notification concerns an error having occurred after the final page (after final page has been analyzed). When the values of the analyzed page which the notification management unit 202 stores therein and the total page number are equal at the timing at which the error has been notified, the notification management unit 202 determines that the error notification concerns the error having occurred after the final page. When the error notification concerns the error having occurred after the final page, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S411. When the notification does not concern the error, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S412.

In the step 411, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit of the error, after the final page has been printed. Incidentally, when the values of the printed page which is stored and the total page number are equal, the notification management unit 202 determines that all pages to the final page have been printed.

In the step S412, the notification management unit 202 checks whether the conventional mode is turned ON (ON) or OFF (OFF), which the notification management unit 202 stores in itself.

When the conventional mode is turned ON, the printing is required which shows the same result as that of a conventional printing apparatus that performs the analysis processing of the print data by a single core. FIG. 5 is a view illustrating one example of a software configuration of a printing apparatus which performs the analysis processing by the single core.

The value for the conventional mode (for instance, 1 for ON and 0 for OFF, or the like) shall be previously designated by a user. When the value for the conventional mode is turned ON, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S413. When the value is not turned ON, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S414. Incidentally, the multi-core CPU 102 may be configured to switch between ON and OFF of the conventional mode, according to a user operation through the input unit 106 or the like. The above description is the same also in an embodiment which will be described later.

In the step S413, the notification management unit 202 checks whether the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page has been printed, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the notification management unit 202 stores in itself, and then notifies the control unit 201 of the error.

In the step S414, the notification management unit 202 checks the kind of the print data for which the analysis processing is being performed. When the print data is the data of a previously set form (for instance, PS (Post Script (registered trademark)), the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S415. When the print data is not data of the previously set form, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S416.

In the step S415, the notification management unit 202 checks that the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page has been printed, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the notification management unit 202 stores in itself, and then notifies the control unit 201 of the error. When the print data is the PS, all the pages to the page of the specification, in which the error occurs, need to be printed, and such a response becomes necessary.

In the step S416, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the error.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the control unit 201.

In a step S501, the control unit 201 checks whether having received the print data. When having received the print data, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S502. When not having received the print data, the control unit 201 repeats the processing of the step S501.

In the step S502, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit 202 of the print data analysis start.

In a step S503, the control unit 201 checks whether error notification is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the error notification is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S504. When the error notification is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S505.

In the step S504, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit 202 of cancel.

In a step S505, the control unit 201 checks whether a notification of a page analysis end is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the notification of the page analysis end is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S506. When the notification of the page analysis end is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S508.

In the step S506, the control unit 201 executes the print processing for the page of which the page analysis end has been notified.

In a step S507, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit 202 of a page which has been printed, as the printed page.

In the step S508, the control unit 201 checks whether the notification of the print data analysis end is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the notification of the print data analysis end is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of the step S501. When the notification of the print data analysis end is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of the step S503.

FIGS. 7A to 7C are views illustrating one example of the processing which prints the print data of 2 pages in the present embodiment. When there is the error in the second page, ordinarily, the error is immediately notified to the control unit 201, as in FIG. 7A (S416), and analysis processing for pages 1 and 2 is canceled. As a result, cancel processing is executed more quickly than that in a conventional printing apparatus (FIG. 8), and a needless output of the page 1 can also be suppressed.

When the conventional mode is turned ON or the print data is the PS, the error is notified to the control unit 201 after the page 1 has been printed, as in FIG. 7B (S413 and S415). As a result, the page 1 is output, and the page 2 is not output. In this case, the output result becomes the same as that of the conventional printing apparatus (FIG. 8).

In addition, when there is the error after the final page of the print data, the cancel processing is performed after the final page has been printed, as in FIG. 7C (S411), and the user can obtain the print result of the pages 1 and 2.

Thus, according to the present embodiment, in the analysis processing of the print data, to which the multi-core is applied, the optimal cancel can be performed according to a situation in which the error has occurred.

Embodiment 2

The processing of the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b is the same as that in FIG. 3 in Embodiment 1, and accordingly the description will be omitted.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the notification management unit 202.

In a step S701, the notification management unit 202 checks whether there is a notification sent from the control unit 201. When there is a notification of cancel, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S702. When there is a notification of a print data analysis start, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S703. In addition, when there is no notification sent from the control unit 201, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S704.

In the step S702, the notification management unit 202 notifies the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b of the cancel of the analysis processing.

In the step S703, the notification management unit 202 notifies the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b of the print data analysis start. Incidentally, in the present embodiment, the analyzing unit 203 a shall analyze odd pages of the print data, and the analyzing unit 203 b shall analyze even pages of the print data.

In the step S704, the notification management unit 202 checks whether there is a notification sent from the analyzing units 203 a and/or 203 b. When there is a notification of an error, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S705. When there is a notification of a page analysis end, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S706. When there is a notification of a print data analysis end, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S707. When there is a notification of the total page number, the notification management unit 202 progresses to the processing of a step S708. When there is no notification sent from the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b, the notification management unit 202 returns to the processing of the step S701.

In the step S705, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the error. In the step S706, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the page analysis end.

In the step S707, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the print data analysis end.

In the step S708, the notification management unit 202 notifies the control unit 201 of the value of the total page number.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the control unit 201.

In a step S801, the control unit 201 checks whether having received the print data. When having received the print data, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S802. When not having received the print data, the control unit 201 repeats the processing of the step S801.

In the step S802, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit 202 of the print data analysis start.

In a step S803, the control unit 201 checks whether the notification of the total page number is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the above described notification is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S804. When the notification is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S805.

In the step S804, the control unit 201 stores the value of the total page number therein.

In the step S805, the control unit 201 checks whether error notification is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the error notification is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S806. When the error notification is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S813.

In the step S806, the control unit 201 checks whether the error notification concerns an error having occurred after the final page. When the error notification concerns the error having occurred after the final page, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S807. When the notification does not concern the error, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S808.

In the step S807, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit of the cancel, after having checked that the final page has been printed.

In the step S808, the control unit 201 checks whether the conventional mode is turned ON or OFF, which the control unit 201 stores in itself. The value for the conventional mode shall be previously designated by a user. When the value for the conventional mode is turned ON, the value for the conventional mode means that the printing apparatus in the present embodiment shall perform the same print processing as that with a conventional single core, and the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S809. When the value is not turned ON, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S810.

In the step S809, the control unit 201 checks that the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page has been printed, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the control unit 201 stores in itself, and then notifies the notification management unit 202 of the cancel.

In the step S810, the control unit 201 checks the kind of the print data for which the analysis processing is being performed. When the print data is PS, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S811. When the print data is not the PS, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S812.

In the step S811, the control unit 201 checks that the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page has been printed, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the control unit 201 stores in itself, and then notifies the notification management unit 202 of the cancel.

In the step S812, the control unit 201 notifies the notification management unit 202 of the cancel, immediately without a pause.

In a step S813, the control unit 201 checks whether a notification of a page analysis end is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the notification is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S814. When the notification is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of a step S816.

In the step S814, the control unit 201 executes the print processing for the page of which the page analysis end has been notified.

In a step S815, the control unit 201 renews a value of the printed page, which the control unit 201 stores in itself.

In the step S816, the control unit 201 checks whether a notification of a print data analysis end is sent from the notification management unit 202. When the notification is sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of the step S801. When the notification is not sent, the control unit 201 progresses to the processing of the step S803.

Also in the present embodiment, similarly to Embodiment 1, in the analysis processing of the print data, to which the multi-core is applied, the optimal cancel can be performed according to a situation in which the error has occurred.

Furthermore, in the present embodiment, the processing of the notification management unit 202 is reduced to only the notification of the error occurring between the control unit 201 and the analyzing units 203 a and 203 b, and the notification of the cancel; and the processing which has been performed by the notification management unit 202 in Embodiment 1 is shifted to the control unit 201. Because of this, though the control unit 201 in Embodiment 1 does not know that there is a plurality of analyzing units, the control unit 201 in the present embodiment knows that there is the plurality of analyzing units, and it is facilitated to introduce the control which is specialized in the multi-core, into the control unit 201.

Embodiment 3

FIG. 11 is a view illustrating one example of a software configuration for analyzing the print data of the printing apparatus.

A control unit 901 controls the whole print processing in a period after having received the print data until printing the print data.

A notification management unit 902 a is positioned between the control unit 901 and an analyzing unit 903 a, and acts as a liaison between the units. The notification management unit 902 a detects an error occurring in the analyzing unit 903 a, and notifies the control unit 901 of the error. In addition, the notification management unit 902 a notifies the analyzing unit 903 a of a cancel notification which the control unit 901 outputs after having received the error notification. The relationship among the control unit 901, the notification management unit 902 b and the analyzing unit 903 b is the same as the relationship among the control unit 901, the notification management unit 902 a and the analyzing unit 903 a.

The analyzing units 903 a and 903 b analyze the print data. When having received the cancel notification, the analyzing units 903 a and 903 b stop analysis processing.

Cancel processing in the case where the error has occurred during an analysis of the print data, in such a software configuration, will be described below with reference to flow charts in FIGS. 12 and 13. Incidentally, the processing of the analyzing units 903 a and 903 b is the same as that in FIG. 3 in Embodiment 1, and accordingly the processing will be omitted here.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the notification management unit 902 a. Here, the processing of the notification management unit 902 a will be described, but a notification management unit 902 b also performs the same processing as that of the notification management unit 902 a.

In a step S1001, the notification management unit 902 a checks whether there is a notification sent from the control unit 901. When there is the notification, the notification management unit 902 a progresses to the processing of a step S1002. When there is not the notification, the notification management unit 902 a progresses to the processing of a step S1003.

In the step S1002, the notification management unit 902 a notifies the analyzing unit 903 a of the notification sent from the control unit 901 as it is.

In the step S1003, the notification management unit 902 a checks whether there is a notification sent from the analyzing unit 903 a. When there is the notification, the notification management unit 902 a progresses to the processing of a step S1004. When there is not the notification, the notification management unit 902 a progresses to the processing of the step S1001.

In the step S1004, the notification management unit 902 a notifies the control unit 901 of the notification sent from the analyzing unit 903 a as it is.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart which illustrates the information processing of the control unit 901.

In a step S1101, the control unit 901 checks whether having received the print data. When having received the print data, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1102. When not having received the print data, the control unit 901 repeats the processing of the step S1101.

In the step S1102, the control unit 901 notifies the notification management units 902 a and 902 b of a print data analysis start. As has been described in the step S1002 in FIG. 12, the notification management units 902 a and 902 b which have received the notification notify the analyzing units 903 a and 903 b of the print data analysis start, respectively. Incidentally, in the present embodiment, the analyzing unit 903 a shall analyze odd pages of the print data, and the analyzing unit 903 b shall analyze even pages of the print data.

In a step S1103, the control unit 901 checks whether the notification of the total page number is sent from the notification management units 902 a and/or 902 b. When the notification of the total page number is sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1104. When the notification is not sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1105.

In the step S1104, the control unit 901 stores the value of the total page number therein.

In the step S1105, the control unit 901 checks whether error notification is sent from the notification management units 902 a and/or 902 b. When the error notification is sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1106. When the error notification is not sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1107.

In the step S1106, the control unit 901 notifies the notification management unit 902 of the cancel, which has sent the error notification.

In the step S1107, the control unit 901 checks whether a notification of a page analysis end is sent from the notification management units 902 a and/or 902 b. When the notification of the page analysis end is sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1108. When the notification of the page analysis end is not sent, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1118.

In the step S1108, the control unit 901 renews a value of the analyzed page, which the control unit 901 stores in itself.

In a step S1109, the control unit 901 checks whether the error has occurred in the analyzing units 903 a and/or 903 b. When the error has occurred, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1110. When the error has not occurred, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1117.

In the step S1110, the control unit 901 checks whether the error concerns an error having occurred after the final page. When the error concerns the error having occurred after the final page, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1111. When the error does not concern the error, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1112.

In the step S1111, the control unit 901 performs print processing for all pages to the final page.

In the step S1112, the control unit 901 checks whether the conventional mode is turned ON or OFF, which the control unit 901 stores in itself. In the present embodiment, a value for the conventional mode shall be previously designated by a user. When the value for the conventional mode is turned ON, the value for the conventional mode means that the printing apparatus in the present embodiment shall perform the same print processing as that with a conventional single core, and the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1113. When the value is not turned ON, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1114.

In the step S1113, the control unit 901 executes the print processing for all pages to the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the control unit 901 stores in itself.

In the step S1114, the control unit 901 checks the kind of the print data for which the analysis processing is being performed. When the print data is the PS, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1115. When the print data is not the PS, the control unit 901 progresses to the processing of a step S1116.

In the step S1115, the control unit 901 executes the print processing for all pages to the page which is one page prior to the error occurring page, with reference to the value of the printed page, which the control unit 901 stores in itself.

In the step S1116, the control unit 901 does not execute the print processing for the error occurring page.

In a step S1117, the control unit 901 executes the print processing for the page of which the analysis has been ended.

In a step S1118, the control unit 901 checks whether a notification of a print data analysis end is sent from the notification management units 902 a and/or 902 b. When the notification is sent, the control unit 901 returns to the processing of the step S1101, and waits for the reception of the next print data. When the notification is not sent, the control unit 901 returns to the processing of the step S1103, and continues the analysis of the print data.

Also in the present embodiment, similarly to Embodiments 1 and 2, in the analysis processing of the print data, to which the multi-core is applied, the optimal cancel can be performed according to a situation in which the error has occurred.

In the present embodiment, both of the notification management unit and the analyzing unit correspond to the multi-core, and accordingly such an expansion is further facilitated as to increase the number of the analyzing units according to the core number of the multi-core CPU.

As has been described above, each of the above described embodiments can perform appropriate processing according to an error, even when a plurality of analyzing units has been applied to the analysis processing of the print data.

OTHER EMBODIMENTS

Embodiment(s) of the present invention can also be realized by a computer of a system or apparatus that reads out and executes computer executable instructions (e.g., one or more programs) recorded on a storage medium (which may also be referred to more fully as a ‘non-transitory computer-readable storage medium’) to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s) and/or that includes one or more circuits (e.g., application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)) for performing the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s), and by a method performed by the computer of the system or apparatus by, for example, reading out and executing the computer executable instructions from the storage medium to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s) and/or controlling the one or more circuits to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s). The computer may comprise one or more processors (e.g., central processing unit (CPU), micro processing unit (MPU)) and may include a network of separate computers or separate processors to read out and execute the computer executable instructions. The computer executable instructions may be provided to the computer, for example, from a network or the storage medium. The storage medium may include, for example, one or more of a hard disk, a random-access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), a storage of distributed computing systems, an optical disk (such as a compact disc (CD), digital versatile disc (DVD), or Blu-ray Disc (BD)™), a flash memory device, a memory card, and the like.

While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-150710, filed Jul. 24, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A printing apparatus comprising: a plurality of analyzing units, each configured to analyze each of different pages of print data and to notify an error in a case that an analysis error occurs; a control unit configured to receive the error notification from the analyzing unit, at which the analysis error occurs, among the plurality of analyzing units, and to notify a cancel to another analyzing unit at which the analysis error does not occur, wherein, the control unit is further configured to notify, on a condition that a printing of all pages before a page at which the analysis error occurs is completed, the cancel to the another analyzing unit.
 2. The printing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising a determining unit configured to determine a kind of page description language of the print data, wherein, if the determining unit determines the kind of page description language of the print data is a first page description language, on the condition that the printing of all pages before a page at which the analysis error occurs is completed, the control unit notifies the cancel to the other analyzing units, while if the determining unit determines the kind of the page description language of the print data is a second page description language, regardless as to whether the printing of all pages before the page at which the analysis error occurs is completed or not, the control unit notifies the cancel to the other analyzing units.
 3. The printing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the first page description language is a postscript.
 4. A printing apparatus comprising: a plurality of analyzing units, each configured to analyze each of different pages of print data; and a printing unit configured to print each page of the print data, based on an analyzing result of the print data by the plurality of analyzing units, wherein the printing unit is further configured to cancel, in a case that an analysis error in the analyzing unit among the plurality of analyzing units occurs, the printing of at least one page of the print data, and wherein the printing unit is further configured not to cancel all of the printing of pages of the print data before the page at which the analysis error occurs.
 5. The printing apparatus according to claim 4, further comprising a determining unit configured to determine a kind of page description language of the print data, wherein, if the determining unit determines the kind of page description language of the print data is a first page description language, the printing unit does not cancel all of the printing of the page of the print data before the page at which the analysis error occurs, while, if the determining unit determines the kind of the page description language of the print data is a second page description language, regardless as to whether the printing of all pages before the page at which the analysis error occurs is completed or not, the printing unit cancels the printing of the page of the print data.
 6. The printing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the first page description language is a postscript.
 7. A printing method comprising: analyzing, by a plurality of analyzing units, each of different pages of print data; notifying an error in a case that an analysis error occurs in one of the plurality of analyzing units; receiving the error notification from the one analyzing unit, at which the analysis error occurs; notifying a cancel to another analyzing unit at which the analysis error does not occur; and notify, on a condition that a printing of all pages before a page at which the analysis error occurs is completed, the cancel to the another analyzing unit. 